The bar had been raised.

The “old guard” of Ufology is really in a very hard spot now, if they dismiss all footage presented by active observers of anomalies as identifiable and they are consistent in that approach, then how can they ever present a footage showing only dots and call the dots UFOs or recomend or use equipment that will only get dots?

They are FORCED now to resolve the structure of their dots and show that their dots are something else to these anomalies, presenting only dots will be intellectually dishonest because these observers are showing more than simple dots. The bar had been raised and the “old guard” must meet the new standard.

Leave a Reply